The Superlight is reasonably light for this value spec. SC Bike Builder app says this bike is 28lbs and that feels about right. To check rear end stiffness I did some flexing of rear wheel with my hand and the swing arm itself. Yep it's there. To check that rear end flex on while riding I whipped the back end end hard into corners and did notice some flex. What will that mean on the trail? Pavement is harder than dirt, but I only weigh 172lbs. The trade off in weight and price between the SL29er and Tallboy aluminum for sure seems to be flex which is not unexpected given the single pivot. Tallboys in C and AL are both stout bikes and feel very confident into corners and chunky trail sections.
My current bike, 26er, has a carbon rear triangle and 12x142mm through axle so I am not exactly unbiased when it comes to rear end stiffness. I don't own a 29er so perhaps the big wheel long tube flex is something I am not used to? I am very interested to see what SL's rear end flex does on the trail. I would not buy an Tallboy AL as the weight penalty and cost would lead me to just go carbon. Still, I don't want to spend $5000 on a SPXc kit. Studies have shown you need to go full bore on the Tallboy C. I'd consider buying the Superlight 29er RXC at 2350 but not until I get a chance to rail ride it. I'm stoked that the bike has Santa Cruz's well thought out snappy 29er geometry. However, I need to know that this bike is more than just an entry level 29er and could handle some aggressive trail riding. I'd like to think a wheel set upgrade and a 10mm rear axle could improve the ride greatly, but that's taking this out of the value range. FP.
No comments:
Post a Comment